Nature is in one's perception of it. The definitions of each reveals supernatural as the aspect of nature which is beyond human comprehension whereas nature refers to everything around oneself, along with it refers to the fundamental intrinsic nature of a being.
The experience of each for a being has been parallel to each other. On one side, the experience of nature is advisable for its various scientific benefits to one's health whereas on the other side it is derogative to encourage supernatural experiences.
But the questions that are most crucial in the experience of supernatural and nature are: How much are we really exposed to each? How much of that experience is a play of our mind or an existential reality? How much are they really different from each other? Isn't supernatural, a part of nature or is it vice-versa?
The experience of each varies from person to person due to unique individuality of every being. Supernatural involves experience of a realm beyond physical as well as perception beyond logic. One may look at it as something beyond logic due to its incomprehensible content which isn't completely grasped by Science yet. There has been various attempts in this direction but they haven't offered concrete realistic interpretations and conclusions. The understanding of nature since the existence of mankind has led to various forms of science. It led to the birth of various disciplines depicting the various shades of nature via their interpretation of it. It is fundamental in understanding the cosmos, not necessarily validating the existence of the various narratives as the physical reality of the universe.